Cases 71 - 80 of 160
Hill v. Matheny et al
as 4:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
Cameron Devon Hill
Defendant:
Jackie Matheny and Teresa King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Matheny et al
as 1:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Cameron Devon Hill
Defendant:
Jackie Matheny and Teresa King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maples v. King Fish Spirits (TV1)
as 3:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Wesley Maples
Defendant:
King Fish Spirits
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. (TV3)
as 3:2013cv00675
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. , Pete E Almeida, American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lewis, Lorraine Lewis, Richard L Lewis, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
McCarter v. King Pharmaceuticals LLC
as 3:2013cv00437
Plaintiff:
Robert E McCarter
Defendant:
King Pharmaceuticals LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Gibbs v. State of Tennessee et al
as 4:2013cv00045
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Gibbs, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Wayne County, Ric Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America,et al v. King Pharmaceuticals LLC
as 2:2013cv00178
Defendant:
King Pharmaceuticals LLC
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413 (b) Clean Air Act
King v. Hunter Warfield, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00356
Plaintiff:
Teresa H King
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
King of Kings, Inc. v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2013cv00244
Plaintiff:
King of Kings, Inc.
Defendant:
Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
