Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Carver v. Ability Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Elbert Sherman Carver
Defendant:
Ability Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Dawson v. Guy et al
as 3:2020cv00164
Defendant:
Tim Carver, Sheriff Joe Guy and McMinn County Sheriff Dept
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. McMinn County Justice Center et al
as 1:2018cv00042
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Dawson
Defendant:
McMinn County Justice Center, Joe Guy, Tim Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carver v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV1)
as 1:2017cv00337
Plaintiff:
Judy Amelia Carver
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Carver v. USA
as 3:2016cv00617
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Travis Carver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McCauley v. Cook et al
as 3:2016cv00573
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E McCauley
Defendant:
Adam Cook, Kevin Grey, Tim Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carver v. Watson et al
as 1:2016cv00351
Plaintiff:
Tony Lynn Carver
Defendant:
Eric Watson, Gabe Thomas and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carver v. Bedford County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 4:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Danny Earl Carver
Defendant:
Bedford County Sheriff's Dept., Austin Swing and Tim Ioky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carver v. Bedford County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 1:2016mc00015
Plaintiff:
Danny Earl Carver
Defendant:
Bedford County Sheriff's Dept., Austin Swing and Tim Ioky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips and Jordan, Inc. et al v. Laughter et al (PLR1)
as 3:2014cv00244
Plaintiff:
Phillips and Jordan, Inc. and Phillips and Jordan, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Angela Laughter, Melissa Jordan, Jade Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
