Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Odell et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Odell, G. Doe, J. Doe and others
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Jim Hivner, Sara Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Adenekan et al v. Clinical Resources, LLC et al (PLR1)
as 3:2019cv00436
Plaintiff:
Donna Miller, Tisha Appline, Oluwaseun "Seun" Adenekan and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Scully and Clinical Resources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00389
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
O'Mary v. Cleveland Medical Clinic, Inc. (JRG1)
as 1:2018cv00004
Defendant:
Cleveland Medical Clinic, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tracy O'Mary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Staubus et al v. Purdue Pharma LP et al (TV2)
as 2:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Barry Staubus , Tony Clark , Dan Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma LP , Purdue Pharma, Inc. , The Purdue Frederick Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 1395
Booth v. US Department of Veteran Affairs et al
as 3:2016cv00146
Plaintiff:
Debra Booth
Defendant:
US Department of Veteran Affairs, William C. Tallent VA Outpatient Clinic LLC, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System VA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
