Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Cases 21 - 30 of 6,618
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00444
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Filauro v. Rausch
as 3:2024cv00677
Plaintiff: Richard Danial Filauro
Defendant: David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. 1011778 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company et al
as 3:2024cv00687
Plaintiff: Robert W. Johnson
Defendant: 1011778 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company, 1019334 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company, Burger King Canada Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ewin et al v. The Kroger Co.
as 3:2024cv00418
Plaintiff: Tywaska Ewin and L.E., a minor
Defendant: The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Kerley
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff: Jason Michael Clark
Defendant: Jonathan Kerley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (WDM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff: John Doe (WDM)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #057 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff: John Doe #057
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe (KWS) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff: John Doe (KWS)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00651
Plaintiff: Howard L. Boyd
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc. and Robert Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Doe #049 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: John Doe #049
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?