Cases 131 - 140 of 1,565
Hessmer v. Bryan
as 3:2022cv00203
Petitioner:
John Allen Hessmer
Respondent:
Sheriff Robert Bryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bailey v. Mays
as 3:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Michael Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Tony Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farley, Jr. v. USA
as 3:2022cv00218
Petitioner:
James Earl Farley, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Niceley v. Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
Hugh Andrew Niceley
Respondent:
Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howse v. Perry, Warden
as 3:2022cv00105
Petitioner:
Rev. Curley Howse
Respondent:
Grady Perry, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Laurel County Detention Facility
as 3:2022cv00133
Petitioner:
LaShawn Lamont Johnson
Respondent:
Laurel County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MPawinayo v. Hall et al
as 3:2022cv00186
Petitioner:
Leopold MPawinayo
Respondent:
Daron Hall and Herbert H. Slatery, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Burdick v. Frink
as 3:2022cv00031
Petitioner:
Robert Jason Burdick
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sandifer v. Hall et al
as 3:2022cv00016
Petitioner:
Lance Sandifer
Respondent:
Hilton Hall and Herbert H. Slatery III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Creasy v. Fink
as 3:2022cv00035
Petitioner:
William G. Creasy
Respondent:
Martin Fink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
