Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Cases 111 - 120 of 3,553
Wooten et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff: Angular Wooten and Leroy Wooten
Defendant: CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00359
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Gilliam v. Prince Health Group LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff: William Steven Gilliam
Defendant: Prince Health Group LLC and John Doe Lead Generator Identified as "P1 Solutions"
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Doe #53 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff: John Doe #53
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #50 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff: John Doe #50
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #052 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: John Doe #052
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #049 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: John Doe #049
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nitschke et al v. John Maher Builders, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff: Chelsie Nitschke and Cynthia George
Defendant: John Maher Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Perkins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff: Rathal Perkins
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?