Cases 111 - 120 of 3,598
Wingate v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wingate
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pritchard v. Garrett et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Pritchard
Defendant:
John Garrett, Amanda Poore and Overton County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Wayne Burgess
Defendant:
City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department, Officer Joel Robison, Officer John Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Cortez Bennett
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Corey Demoris Gilbert
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Churchwell v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Lavonta Churchwell
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Alvertis Boyd
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Terrell Burgess
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Juvonta Carpenter
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Yates
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
