Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Bailey v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville et al
as 3:2011cv00767
Plaintiff:
Derrick E. Bailey
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Davidson County Sheriff Office, Curtis Hafley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archibald v. Face It Newspaper et al
as 3:2011cv00728
Plaintiff:
Karl Archibald, Jr.
Defendant:
Face It Newspaper, Dotson, Inc., Sheriff's Department, Davidson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Maximus et al
as 3:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Maximus, Unum, Hugh O. Maclellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Maximus et al
as 3:2010cv00412
Plaintiff:
(f/n/u) Doe
Defendant:
Maximus, Unum, Hugh O. Maclellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBride v. Clear Channel
as 3:2009cv00742
Plaintiff:
Julius McBride
Defendant:
Clear Channel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayes et al v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 1:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
Keith R. Mayes, Sr., Ruth V. Mayes and Gilda L. Mayes
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals, Maury County Sheriffs Department and News Channel 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. WTVF Channel 5 News
as 3:2008cv00761
Petitioner:
James Douglas Smith
Respondent:
WTVF Channel 5 News
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. WTVF Channel 5 News
as 3:2008mc00179
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
WTVF Channel 5 News
McClain v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2007cv01099
Plaintiff:
James E. McClain
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Metro Public Defender's Office, Metro NPD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Documentary Channel, Inc. v. Pyxix Corporation
as 3:2007cv00673
Plaintiff:
Documentary Channel, Inc., Documentary Channel, Inc. and Documentary Channel, Inc.
Defendant:
Pyxix Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
