Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Peeler et al v. Dickson, City of et al
as 3:2018cv01175
Defendant:
Seth Lyles, Dickson, City of and Todd Christian
Plaintiff:
Robert Peeler and Justin R. Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LogistiPoint Consulting, LLC v. Davis et al
as 3:2017cv01504
Defendant:
Joshua Tree Group, LLC and Mike Mullican
Counter Plaintiff:
Seth Davis
Plaintiff:
LogistiPoint Consulting, LLC
Interested Party:
Cabela's Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Randy Moore
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Baker et al v. Zajac et al
as 3:2018cv00905
Defendant:
Landscape Giants, LLC and Jared Zajac
Plaintiff:
Khalil Newman, Anthony Baker, Seth-Anthony Howse and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Williams v. Outdoor Recreation Company of America, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00665
Defendant:
Outdoor Recreation Company of America, LLC, Joshua Gulick and John Hamilton
Plaintiff:
Seth Anderson Williams
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Taylor v. Haynes
as 3:2017cv01443
Plaintiff:
Seth Taylor
Defendant:
Keeda Jarresse Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. D.C.S.O. et al
as 3:2017cv01359
Plaintiff:
Seth Taylor
Defendant:
Darren Hall and Harold Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2016cv03257
Plaintiff:
Seth Taylor
Defendant:
Dwayne Butler, James Lemaster, Jacob Steen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Hall et al
as 3:2016cv02595
Plaintiff:
Daven Decarlo Turner
Defendant:
Darron Hall, Elizabeth Foy, Granvisse L. Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stafford v. City of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee
as 3:2016cv02507
Plaintiff:
Seth Stafford
Defendant:
City of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Graves v. Wilson County Judicial Commissioner
as 3:2015cv01151
Plaintiff:
Seth David Graves
Defendant:
Wilson County Judicial Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
