Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Frierson v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2015cv00390
Plaintiff:
Wanda Frierson
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and Veterans Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kovach v. US Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2013cv01201
Plaintiff:
Thomas F. Kovach
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Gary Trende and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. Country Music Media Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00931
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Country Music Media Group, Inc., Rita Schneder, Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nixon v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2009mc00159
Plaintiff:
Kenneth T. Nixon
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and V.A. Hospital
Johnson v. Country Music Media Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2009mc00111
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Country Music Media Group, Inc., Rita Schneder, Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Dill v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2009cv00088
Plaintiff:
David H. Dill
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs and Office of Personnel Management, The
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
