Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Armstrong v. Raybin
as 3:2014cv01744
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Armstrong
Defendant:
David L. Raybin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Armstrong v. Tennessee Education Lottery, Corporation
as 3:2014cv01270
Plaintiff:
Denise S. Armstrong
Defendant:
Tennessee Education Lottery, Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Armstrong v. Tennessee Education Lottery, Corporation
as 2:2014cv00055
Plaintiff:
Denise S. Armstrong
Defendant:
Tennessee Education Lottery, Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Russell et al
as 1:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
Claudale R. Armstrong
Defendant:
Lee Russell and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. George
as 1:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Marvin L. Armstrong
Defendant:
Enoch George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pirelli Armstrong Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01382
Plaintiff:
Pirelli Armstrong Retiree Medical Benefits Trust
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. , Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Pirelli Armstrong Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01378
Plaintiff:
Pirelli Armstrong Retiree Medical Benefits Trust
Defendant:
Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc., Teikoku Seiyaku Co., LTD, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baggett v. Montgomery County Jail et al
as 3:2012cv00952
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Baggett
Defendant:
D. Armstrong, (f/n/u) Seacrest and (f/n/u) Teamer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00728
Plaintiff:
Jill Victoria Armstrong
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
