Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Slade v. Barrett et al
as 2:2018cv00002
Defendant:
Edward A. Barrett and Badger Transport, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jason Slade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrett v. Genovese
as 3:2017cv00062
Petitioner:
Jerome Sidney Barrett
Respondent:
Kevin Genovese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Messina v. Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Inc.
as 3:2016cv02871
Plaintiff:
Christopher Messina
Defendant:
Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
George et al v. Haslam et al
as 3:2014cv02182
Plaintiff:
Tracey E. George , Ellen Wright Clayton , Deborah Webster-Clair and others
Defendant:
William Edward Haslam, Tre Hargett, Mark Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifton v. Schofield et al
as 3:2014cv02026
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Clifton, Charles Montague, Derrick Payne and others
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodall, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Saunders et al
as 1:2012cv00178
Defendant:
Jason Saunders, Bruce Coates, Cynthia Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome S. Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stratford Land Fund IV, L.P. et al v. SV Properties, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv01160
Plaintiff:
Stratford Land Fund IV, L.P. and SLF IV Lending, L.P.
Defendant:
SV Properties, LLC, Terry Rasmussen and Sidwell Barrett & Welch, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Winningham v. Andrews et al
as 2:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
Thomas Deloy Winningham
Defendant:
David Andrews, Putnam County, Tennessee, Tim Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Phoenix Credit, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00278
Petitioner:
Deborah L. Akers
Respondent:
Phoenix Credit, LLC, Buffaloe & Associates, PLC and Debbie McMillan Barrett
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
