Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Bennett v. Parker et al
as 3:2015cv00198
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Charles Carpenter, Tommy Vance, f/n/u Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Vance et al
as 3:2015cv00190
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Tommy Vance, Earl Harris, f/n/u Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. R.M.S.I. Trust Fund Dept. et al
as 3:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
R.M.S.I. Trust Fund Dept., Charles W. Carpenter, Carolme Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2015cv00101
Plaintiff:
Terrance Burke
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Settle v. Carpenter
as 3:2015cv00009
Petitioner:
Mike Settle
Respondent:
Wayne Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bennett v. Thomas et al
as 3:2014cv02379
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Christie Thomas, Blake Pollock, Javin Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Thomas et al
as 3:2014cv02380
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Christie Thomas, Charles Carpenter, Michael Keys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett V. Riverbend Trust Fund Dept.
as 3:2014cv02350
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Riverbend Trust Fund Dept., Ashley Demonbrun, Jane Lovell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. TN Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv02338
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Christie Thomas, Charles Carpenter, Tony Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz et al v. Sumner County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2014cv02300
Plaintiff:
Pamela Bentz , Regina Carpenter and Elizabeth Rhyne
Defendant:
Sumner County, Tennessee, Abbey Thompson and Carl Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
