Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Tomasik et al v. Goins et al
as 3:2013cv01118
Plaintiff:
James Tomasik , J. Daniel Tomasik and Libertarian Party of Tennessee
Defendant:
Mark Goins , Tre Hargett and Shelby County Election Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner-Golden et al v. Hargett et al
as 3:2012cv00765
Plaintiff:
Daphne Turner-Golden , City of Memphis and Sullistine Bell
Defendant:
Tre Hargett and Mark Goins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bragorgos et al v. Goins et al
as 3:2012cv00618
Plaintiff:
John Bragorgos , John McFerren and John Leake
Defendant:
Mark Goins, Tre Hargett, Fayette County Election Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Haslam et al
as 2:2012cv00023
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Davis
Defendant:
Bill Haslam, Tre Hargett and Mark Goins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Green Party of Tennessee et al v. Hargett et al
as 3:2011cv00692
Plaintiff:
Green Party of Tennessee and Constitution Party of Tennessee
Defendant:
Tre Hargett and Mark Goins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. Whites Creek Healthcare, LLC
as 3:2011cv00385
Plaintiff:
Sharon Smith and Shannon Renee Goins
Defendant:
Whites Creek Healthcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Goins v. Andrews et al
as 3:2009cv00926
Plaintiff:
Byron Tu'Shawn Goins
Defendant:
Desiree Andrews, (f/n/u) Sator and Jonathen Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goins v. Andrews et al
as 3:2009cv00787
Plaintiff:
Byron Tu'Shawn Goins
Defendant:
Desiree Andrews, Dr. Sator and Jonathen Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin et al v. Egyptian Lacquer Manufacturing Company
as 3:2009cv00627
Plaintiff:
Scott Martin, Galyn Martin, Peggy Driskill and others
Defendant:
Egyptian Lacquer Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
