Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Kelley v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2016cv00632
Petitioner:
Marty Joe Kelley
Respondent:
Cherry Lindamood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Duffer v. Sumner County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv00860
Plaintiff:
Jacob Duffer
Defendant:
Sumner County, Tennessee , f/n/u Henry , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Kelley v. George et al
as 1:2014cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jason Dean Kelley
Defendant:
Enoch George , Floyd l/n/u and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron-Ledford v. Sumner County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2014cv00592
Plaintiff:
Ashley Cameron-Ledford
Defendant:
Sumner County, Tennessee, Janet Bozarth, Hillary Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wanta et al v. Ameridose, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00987
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Wanta and Kelley S. Wanta
Defendant:
Ameridose, LLC, Medical Sales Management, Inc., Medical Sales Management SW, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilliam v. Wagonshultz et al
as 1:2013cv00096
Plaintiff:
Hugh Kelley Gilliam
Defendant:
Deborah Wagonshultz and Enoch George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilliam v. Wagonshultz et al
as 1:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
Hugh Kelley Gilliam
Defendant:
Deborah Wagonshultz and Enoch George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Paisley et al
as 3:2013cv00414
Plaintiff:
Amy Elizabeth Connor Bowen
Defendant:
Brad Douglas Paisley, Carrie Marie Underwood, John Kelley Lovelace and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Pendergrass et al v. City Gear, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv01287
Plaintiff:
Denithia Pendergrass and Alena Kelley
Defendant:
City Gear, LLC , Shelmar Retail Partners, Inc. , Shelmar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
