Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,530
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Zimmer v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff: Brevan Zimmer
Defendant: Rutherford County and Dr. John Daniel Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nitschke et al v. John Maher Builders, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff: Chelsie Nitschke and Cynthia George
Defendant: John Maher Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Johnson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff: James Johnson
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesbster v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00508
Plaintiff: Javon Webster
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff: Dennis Edward Hancock
Defendant: Centurion Health and Unknown John or Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #062 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: John Doe #062
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pegues v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff: Sebastian Pegues
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hills v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff: Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant: Sheriff John Myers, Lt. Susan Taylor and Sgt. Dana Mobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curran III v. Fronabarger et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff: John F. (Jef) Curran III
Defendant: Carl A. Fronabarger, Unknown Successor Trust and Jimmy L. Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?