Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Phillips et al v. McDonald's Corporation, et al
as 3:2015cv00922
Plaintiff:
Andre Phillips, Davida Holt and Wyonn Holt
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation and McDonald's Restaurants of Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hoover et al v. McDonald's Restaurants of Tennessee, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00557
Plaintiff:
Mindy Hoover and Brandy Henry
Defendant:
McDonald's Restaurants of Tennessee, Inc. , McDonald's Corporation and Unknown Employees of McDonald's Restaurants of Tennessee, Inc. and McDonald's Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Graves et al
as 3:2015cv01440
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ricardo McDonald
Defendant:
Steve Graves, Quality Corrections Healthcare, Valeria Uselton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. McDonald
as 3:2015cv01108
Plaintiff:
Celia Williams and Brigitte Cox
Defendant:
Robert A. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Azbell v. Robert A. McDonald
as 3:2015cv00983
Plaintiff:
Karen Azbell
Defendant:
Robert A. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Givens v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00965
Plaintiff:
LaTonya Givens
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, Anthony McGuire and Walmart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
England v. Couch et al
as 1:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
Herbert Ray England
Defendant:
Lonnie Couch, State of Tennessee, Centerstone Mental Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester et al v. K.H. Sharp et al
as 3:2015cv00730
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester
Respondent:
K.H. Sharp, R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rochester v. Loubshire et al
as 3:2015cv00371
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
f/n/u Loubshire, R.B. Harwell and K.F. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 3:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald, J. M. Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
