Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Nelson v. Hardeman County Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv01192
Plaintiff:
Oswald M. Nelson
Defendant:
Trainmem and Mental Health Provider, f/n/u Henson, f/nu Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce, et al v. Brown Shoe Company, Inc., et al
as 2:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Gregory Pierce and Amanda N. Pierce
Defendant:
Brown Shoe Company and American Sporting Goods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Ameridose, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01034
Plaintiff:
Terry Pierce
Defendant:
Ameridose, LLC, Medical Sales Management, Inc., Medical Sales Management SW, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Besaw et al v. Ameridose, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00984
Plaintiff:
Travis Besaw , Donna Branham , Ben Bratcher and others
Defendant:
Ameridose, LLC, Medical Sales Management, Inc., Medical Sales Management SW, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter v. Williams et al
as 3:2013cv00592
Plaintiff:
Stephen L. Hunter
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Williams and (f/n/u) Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrow v. Comprehensive Pain Specialist et al
as 3:2013cv00239
Plaintiff:
Brenda Farrow
Defendant:
Comprehensive Pain Specialist and Rebacca Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farrow v. Comprehensive Pain Specialist et al
as 3:2013mc00019
Plaintiff:
Brenda Farrow
Defendant:
Comprehensive Pain Specialist and Rebacca Pierce
Dodd v. Simmons et al
as 1:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
Walter Earl Dodd, Jr.
Defendant:
Jerry Simmons, Charles Pierce and City of Centerville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00637
Petitioner:
John Pierce Lankford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collins et al v. Maury County Jail et al
as 1:2012cv00047
Plaintiff:
Michael Darren Collins and Tony Lamar Pierce, Jr.
Defendant:
Maury County Jail and Enoch George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
