Cases 31 - 40 of 113
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Vasquez et al
as 3:2017cv00694
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Gustavo Vasquez and Las Vaqueritas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Caruthers v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00163
Plaintiff:
Maggie Caruthers
Defendant:
Sunbeam Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Electrolux Major Appliances North America Division of Electrolux Home Products, Inc. v. Hatch Stamping Company
as 3:2016cv03167
Plaintiff:
Electrolux Major Appliances North America Division of Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Hatch Stamping Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 3:2016cv02798
Plaintiff:
Melissa Moore
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Parchman v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 3:2016cv02376
Plaintiff:
Ashleigh Parchman
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
China Export & Credit Corporation v. Carlisle Transportation Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00846
Defendant:
Carlisle Transportation Products, Inc. , Carlisle Companies, Inc. , Carlisle Fluid Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carroll et al v. Tristar Products, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00009
Plaintiff:
Tonia Kaye Carroll and Kerry Dale Carroll
Defendant:
Tristar Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
