Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Richardson et al v. Contemporary Services Corporation
as 3:2012cv01278
Plaintiff:
Marcia Richardson and James Richardson
Defendant:
Contemporary Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Terry Richardson Concrete LLC v. Mack Mechanichal, Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00109
Plaintiff:
Terry Richardson Concrete LLC
Defendant:
Mack Mechanical, Inc and American Safety Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Richardson v. Colsen
as 3:2012cv00409
Petitioner:
Antonio D. Richardson
Respondent:
Roland Colsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson et al v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00368
Plaintiff:
Greg Richardson , Deborah Richardson and Robert Richardson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Richardson v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2012mc00003
Petitioner:
Erique Jermaine Richardson
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Richardson v. United States of America
as 3:2011cv00758
Petitioner:
Donald Michael Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mahamed v. BAC Home Loans Serv LP et al
as 3:2011cv00619
Plaintiff:
Flarrie Kimberley Mahamed
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Serv LP , Bank of America, N.A. , Rubin Lublin Suarez Serrano, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA) v. John M. Richardson Jr., P.C. et al
as 3:2011cv00609
Plaintiff:
Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA)
Defendant:
John M. Richardson Jr., P.C. and John M. Richardson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Richardson et al v. Didriksen et al
as 3:2010cv01027
Plaintiff:
Nita W. Richardson and Lindsey L. Richardson
Defendant:
Daniel W. Didriksen and Trek Bicycle Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
