Cases 41 - 50 of 873
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kelly v. Spangler et al
as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Kelly
Defendant:
Jerry Spangler and Stacey Oats
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyman v. YesCare Corp. et al
as 3:2022cv01081
Plaintiff:
James E. Hyman
Defendant:
YesCare Corp., Valitas Intermediate Holdings, Inc., CHS TX, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Barnett et al v. Worley et al
as 2:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Richard Barnett, William E. Benge, Christopher Lee Duff and others
Defendant:
Amanda Worley, Jennifer Phillips Cross, Patricia Eldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
E.S. v. Maury County Board of Education, The et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
John Doe and E. S.
Defendant:
Maury County Board of Education, The and Rex Allen Wells
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX of Education Amendment of 1972
Defoe et al v. Dixon
as 3:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
Brett Defoe and Amanda Defoe
Defendant:
MacKenzie E. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barbee v. Zuckerberg et al
as 3:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Malinda Deshelle Barbee
Defendant:
Mark E. Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Christopher Maurice Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Copple v. Southern Bank of Tennessee
as 3:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
George E. Copple
Defendant:
Southern Bank of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Taylor v. Ryers et al
as 3:2022cv00689
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
E. Ryers, Metropolitan Government and E. Byers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
