Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Spann et al v. Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2010cv01115
Plaintiff:
Steven Spann , Linda Smithson and Orval Sesler
Defendant:
Dickson County, Tennessee and Jerry Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potts v. Cumb. Co. Sherriff et al
as 2:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Potts
Defendant:
Cumb. Co. Sherriff, Butch Burgess and (f/n/u) Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potts v. Cumb. Co. Sherriff et al
as 1:2010cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Potts
Defendant:
Cumb. Co. Sherriff, Butch Burgess and Unknown Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carino v. Cumberland County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2010cv00062
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ruben Carino
Defendant:
Cumberland County Sheriff Dept., Butch Burgess, James Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Maximus et al
as 3:2010cv00412
Plaintiff:
(f/n/u) Doe
Defendant:
Maximus, Unum, Hugh O. Maclellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Maximus et al
as 3:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Maximus, Unum, Hugh O. Maclellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Escue v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2010cv00296
Plaintiff:
Ricky D. Escue
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, f/n/u Koehn, f/n/u Wardlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Dunn-Dixon et al
as 2:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Kenny D. Phillips
Defendant:
Regina Dunn-Dixon, Cumberland County, Butch Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reagan v. Dixon et al
as 2:2010cv00017
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Reagan
Defendant:
Regina Dixon, Debbie Dixon, Butch Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
