Cases 41 - 50 of 1,679
Doe (WDM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WDM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #056 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
John Doe #056
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (ELA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (ELA), John Doe #2 (BMA), John Doe #3 (RNB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilliam v. Prince Health Group LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
William Steven Gilliam
Defendant:
Prince Health Group LLC and John Doe Lead Generator Identified as "P1 Solutions"
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hartley v. Cate et al
as 3:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Hartley
Defendant:
Nathan Cate, Criminal Court Clerk's Office, Central Records Division (Metro Police Department) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #049 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Doe #049
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #50 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
John Doe #50
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #052 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Doe #052
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #53 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
John Doe #53
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Southern Health Partners
as 3:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Willard William Wright
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
