Cases 51 - 60 of 147
Boshers v. Rawland et al
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Boshers
Defendant:
Bucky Rawland, Jimmy Bird and Daylon Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2016cv02480
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Duke
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Rutherford County Sheriff Dept., Robert Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judd v. Baxter, City of, Tennessee et al
as 2:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Freddie E. Judd
Defendant:
Baxter, City of, Tennessee , Putnam County, Tennessee, Maggie Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. McClure et al
as 3:2016cv01314
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Brandi McClure, David Bruce Westbrooks, Tony Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Fuller et al
as 3:2016cv01026
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Robert Fuller, David Bruce Westbrooks, Fred Schildkamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers et al v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00845
Plaintiff:
Tonya Bowers , Cora Adams , Margaret Bennett and others
Defendant:
ITT Educational Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kurtz v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01028
Plaintiff:
Walter Kurtz, Bobbie Waynick, David Wilson and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bennett v. Brown et al
as 3:2015cv00937
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Andrew Brown, Bruce Westbrooks, Carolyn Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Westbrooks et al
as 3:2015cv00854
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Bruce Westbrooks, Tony Howerton, Derrick Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
