Cases 51 - 60 of 3,598
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00803
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Gayles v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
James Gayles
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and Amber L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00795
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Mays v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00876
Petitioner:
John Allen Mays
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Old School Sales, LLC et al v. Cooper et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Defendant:
City of Spring Hill, Andrew Burdett, Brent Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Sak Wholesale, LLC and Old School Sales, LLC doing business as Old School Vapor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCoy v. Dickson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2024cv00731
Defendant:
Nurse Cristal, L.T. Huppe, Dr. John or Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Marcus V. Green
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphrey v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00611
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Plaintiff:
Lakeith Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoemaker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00686
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, John Doe #1 and Amber L. Phillips
Plaintiff:
Michelle Shoemaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
