Cases 61 - 70 of 204
Stone v. Capital Accounts, LLC
as 3:2019cv00615
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Stone
Defendant:
Capital Accounts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cunningham v. Department of Children's Services, et al
as 3:2019cv00501
Defendant:
Jennifer Nichols, Tameika Gray, Department of Children Services and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanton v. Joyner et al
as 3:2019cv00270
Defendant:
Jamie Johnson, Daron Hall, Kevin Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Lawrence County, Tennessee, et al
as 1:2019cv00036
Defendant:
Misty Anderson, LPN, Shawn Gentry, M.D., Northside Medical Professionals, PC and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donaldson et al v. Hendren
as 3:2019cv00229
Plaintiff:
S. D., Kendra Donaldson and Clay Donaldson
Defendant:
Jennifer Lynn Hendren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00183
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bobo v. Gates et al
as 3:2019cv00116
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Bobo
Defendant:
Brian Gordon Gates and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Quarles v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00029
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Quarles
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dawes v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2019cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lynn Dawes
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hain et al v. Seider et al
as 3:2018cv01312
Plaintiff:
Tobias Hain, Hain Lifescience GMBH, David Hain and others
Counter Plaintiff:
Jennifer Seider
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
