Cases 81 - 90 of 945
Harrison v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Pamela L. Harrison
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc., Prospect Airport Services, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thomas v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Derwin Valentino Thomas
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe (WDM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WDM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #056 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
John Doe #056
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (ELA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (ELA), John Doe #2 (BMA), John Doe #3 (RNB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilliam v. Prince Health Group LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
William Steven Gilliam
Defendant:
Prince Health Group LLC and John Doe Lead Generator Identified as "P1 Solutions"
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Wooten et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Angular Wooten and Leroy Wooten
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Doe #049 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Doe #049
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
