Cases 1 - 10 of 3,548
Rubin Lublin TN PLLC v. Greenberg et al
as 3:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Rubin Lublin TN PLLC
Defendant:
Daniel S. Greenberg, Carla D. Gifford, Estate of Marian Wise and others
Cross Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Davidson County Tennessee, Williamson County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Real Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Burnett v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Terrance Burnett
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Dickson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Ronnie McCoy
Defendant:
Dickson County Sheriff Office, Sheriff Eads, Chief Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Cortney Perry
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe (PDB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
John Doe (PDB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (JDC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
John Doe (JDC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Leah Joy Ward
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Doe (RLM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RLM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reguli v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Connie Reguli
Defendant:
Joseph A. Woodruff, Estate of Kimberly Helper, John Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
