Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Nissan North America, Inc. v. Woodfield Nissan, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Defendant:
Woodfield Nissan, Inc. and Roy Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
Smith v. Elpaso County Mail Employees et al
as 3:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
Elpaso County Mail Employees, f/n/u Carr, f/nu McCalister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. Carr et al
as 3:2022cv00905
Plaintiff:
Robert Sharp
Defendant:
John Dustin Carr and Charles Consiglio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Bostick v. Carr et al
as 3:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
Thelma Bostick
Defendant:
Jess D. Carr, Big M Transportation, Inc. and Penn National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Carr v. Astellas Pharma US, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00651
Plaintiff:
Karen Carr
Defendant:
Astellas Pharma US, Inc. and Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hicks v. City of Millersville et al
as 3:2021cv00837
Plaintiff:
Mason Robert James Hicks
Defendant:
City of Millersville, Melissa Pearce, Blake Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Hall
as 3:2021cv00170
Respondent:
Hilton Hall, Jr.
Petitioner:
Derrick D. Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Butler et al v. Smith County Board of Education et al
as 2:2019cv00091
Defendant:
Smith County Board of Education, Barry H. Smith, Dusty Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Sharona Carr, Jason Carr and Kelly Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
