Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Newcomb et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Ralph Newcomb, Jessica Newcomb, Todd Mathis and others
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and Williamson County School Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathis v. Phillips et al
as 3:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
Douglas Marshall Mathis
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Creekside Terrace LLC v. Town of Burns Municipal Planning Commission et al
as 3:2021cv00248
Defendant:
Landon Mathis, Timothy V. Potter, Town of Burns Municipal Planning Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Creekside Terrace LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Genovese
as 3:2018cv01330
Petitioner:
Gregory Lamar Mathis
Respondent:
Kevin Genovese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mathis v. RMSI Medical Services, et al
as 3:2015cv00732
Plaintiff:
Douglas M. Mathis
Defendant:
f/n/u LA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Qualls v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
Eric Qualls
Defendant:
Debra Johnson, Darrell Murphy, Jason Culp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Endless Access LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Endless Access LLC, Endless Access Distributors, LLC, Saveonresorts.com, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Heard v. Crumpton et al
as 3:2015cv00172
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Heard
Defendant:
Leslie Crumpton and Christy Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bledsoe v. Scholfield et al
as 3:2013cv00564
Plaintiff:
Chikita Bledsoe
Defendant:
Derrick Scholfield, Jim Dickman, Reuben V. Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Schofield et al
as 3:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
Fred E. Dean
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Catherine Posey, Jim Thrasher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
