Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Kirby, et al v. Priority Wrecker Service, Inc., et al
as 3:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Taylor L. Kirby and Thomas Maynard
Defendant:
Priority Wrecker Service, Inc. and Jonathan Maye
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mayes v. Williams, MD
as 1:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Mayes
Defendant:
Dr. Kenneth Williams, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. Strada et al
as 3:2023cv00952
Plaintiff:
Henry Eugene Hodges
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Centurion of Tennessee, Karen Milliner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitman v. Priority Wrecker Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitman
Defendant:
Priority Wrecker Service, Inc. and Jonathan Maye
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant:
Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Knight et al v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, The
as 3:2020cv00922
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County and Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, The
Plaintiff:
James Knight and Jason Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. Rodela et al
as 1:2020cv00057
Defendant:
Dr. Keith Ivens, Grady Perry, Warden and Dr. Elaine Rodela
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00712
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Crockett v. Mayes
as 3:2020cv00644
Petitioner:
Antonio M. Crockett
Respondent:
Tony Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
