Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Smith v. Wilson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2018cv00462
Plaintiff:
Yamego Smith
Defendant:
Wilson County Sheriff's Office, Southern Health Partners, Lebanon Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Floyd et al
as 3:2018cv00327
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Young
Defendant:
Marcus Floyd and Davidson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Floyd et al
as 3:2018cv00326
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Young
Defendant:
Marcus Floyd and Davidson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2018cv00219
Plaintiff:
Ronnie T. Baker
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Ruby Joyner and Beth Gentry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
French v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jamon French
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hiles v. Cannon County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Larry J. Hiles
Defendant:
Cannon County Sheriff's Office and Cannon County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
Wesley R. Thomas
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Austin Peay State University-Board of Trustees, Brookdale Clarksville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Norfleet v. Renner et al
as 3:2017cv01232
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Norfleet
Defendant:
Heather Ann Renner, Judy Farris , Houston County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Maury County et al
as 1:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Harold M. Smith and Keith Pierce
Defendant:
Maury County and Maury County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2017cv00963
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Ray
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, A.B.L. Food Service, James Beachboard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
