Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Maxwell v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Stephen Cortney Maxwell
Defendant:
Sheila Jackson Lee and United States Government and Congress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. United States Government
as 3:2022cv01060
Petitioner:
Antonio Martin
Respondent:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Starks v. United States Government
as 3:2022cv00731
Petitioner:
Ricky Starks
Respondent:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Irvin v. Haynes et al
as 3:2016cv03015
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
William Joseph Haynes, Jr., The Judicial Branch of the United States Government and Loretta Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mulvey v. Perez et al
as 3:2016cv02932
Plaintiff:
John A. Mulvey
Defendant:
Thomas E. Perez , United States Department of Labor and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Perry v. United States Government
as 3:2015cv00457
Plaintiff:
Carl Perry
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Visconi v. United States Government
as 3:2012cv01012
Plaintiff:
Frank J. Visconi
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ignacio v. U.S. Dollar et al
as 3:2008cv00602
Petitioner:
Tevis R. Ignacio
Respondent:
U.S. Dollar, United States Government, U.S. Justice Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ignacio v. U.S. Dollar et al
as 3:2008mc00111
Plaintiff:
Tevis R. Ignacio
Defendant:
U.S. Dollar, United States Government, U.S. Justice Department and others
Weidrick v. Bush et al
as 3:2007cv00687
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Weidrick
Defendant:
George W. Bush, National Security Agency, CIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
