Cases 11 - 20 of 113
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2022cv02697
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson and Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John P. Yates, Blair, Lt. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Cauley et al
as 2:2022cv02611
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
K. Cauley, Asst. Warden Hall, Camp Admin Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Eason v. Garland et al
as 2:2022cv02756
Petitioner:
Charles Alvin Eason
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland and Anthony Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
White v. Long et al
as 1:2022cv01217
Plaintiff:
Lance White
Defendant:
Chester Long, Jeremy Epperson and Roy B. Morgan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goff v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv01190
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Goff
Defendant:
Judge Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Bradley Champine and Jeremy B. Epperson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vinyard v. Madison County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv01143
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey B. Vinyard
Defendant:
Madison County Jail, Jackson Police Department, FNU Boxely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vinyard v. LNU et al
as 1:2022cv01147
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey B. Vinyard
Defendant:
Max LNU and Criminal Justice Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferies v. Lee
as 2:2022cv02258
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Jefferies
Defendant:
William B. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv02725
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Kenneth Southerland, D. Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Lee
as 2:2021cv02573
Plaintiff:
Melvin Davis, Andrew Sidney Phillips, Samuel Matthews and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
