Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Delk v. CoreCivic et al
as 2:2022cv02540
Plaintiff:
Adrian Deshun Delk
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Columbus Malone, Warden Grady Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Delk v. CoreCivic et al
as 1:2022cv02540
Plaintiff:
Adrian Deshun Delk
Defendant:
CoreCivic doing business as Hardeman County Correctional Facility, Columbus Malone, Warden Grady Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Delk v. CoreCivic et al
as 2:2022cv02539
Plaintiff:
Adrian Deshun Delk
Defendant:
CoreCivic, danita woods, Warden Grady Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Griham v. Memphis City Police Department City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02506
Plaintiff:
Justin griham, Emmanuel Meniru, Justin Jaico Griham and others
Defendant:
Memphis City Police Department City of Memphis, Taiyuan Brooks, A Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02505
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Malone v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2018cv02251
Plaintiff:
Patricia Malone
Defendant:
Shelby County, Paul Hagerman, Austin Scholefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
