Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Nettles v. State of Tennessee Government et al
as 2:2024cv02241
Plaintiff:
Doris Ann Nettles
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Government, Melanie Taylor Jefferson d/b/a Chancellor of the Chancery Court of Shelby County Tennessee, Joedae L. Jenkins d/b/a Chancellor of the Chancery Court of Shelby County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ford v. Professional Credit Management, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02128
Plaintiff:
Devin Ford
Defendant:
Professional Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wright v. Carter et al
as 2:2022cv02830
Plaintiff:
Glenn R. Wright and Rodney G. Wright
Defendant:
Alycia Carter, Daniel Dreysen, 3rd Floor Expundment [sic] Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Anderson v. First Horizon Bank et al
as 2:2022cv02429
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Anderson
Defendant:
First Horizon Bank, D. Bryan Jordan, Kevin Beeson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
