Cases 81 - 90 of 7,279
Taylor v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02037
Petitioner:
Derrick Taylor
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dotson v. Pounds
as 2:2024cv02053
Petitioner:
Jessie Dotson
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chapman v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Donald Allen, FNU Boyd, Joshua Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Onyiego v. Wardlow
as 2:2024cv02073
Petitioner:
Justus Onyiego
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tims v. Shelby Co. Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
William Tims
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Detention Center, Sgt. Felts, Racardo Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01051
Petitioner:
Cordetrick Montrelle Perry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Douglas v. Whiteville Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Douglas
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility, Chance Leeds and Latoya Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv01023
Petitioner:
Andre Perkins
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams et al v. Aramark et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Williams, Corey D. Lurry and Jamal Moore
Defendant:
Aramark, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bannister v. Naveed
as 2:2024cv02084
Plaintiff:
Waylon Bannister
Defendant:
Gill Naveed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
