Cases 1 - 10 of 84
King v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Jacorey King
Defendant:
Warden Rose, Officer McCrainey, Unknown Transportation Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson v. Pounds
as 2:2024cv02053
Petitioner:
Jessie Dotson
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nagorny v. Dotson et al
as 1:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
Henry Joshua Nagorny
Defendant:
Lee Dotson, Sharon Rose, Northwest Correctional Complex Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beadle v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2023cv02085
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jerome Beadle
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Officer FNU Hilson, Doctor C. Gatewood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Woods et al
as 1:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
Carlos D. Mathis
Defendant:
Unit Manager Woods, Unit Sgt. Mann, Lt. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Parker et al
as 1:2020cv01283
Plaintiff:
Michael Horton
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Candace Whisman, Lee Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Windom v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01269
Defendant:
Keith Harding, Tony Parker, Lee Dotson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronardo L. Windom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2020cv02351
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Officer Freeman, Officer Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Corry Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeal v. Dotson et al
as 1:2020cv01043
Defendant:
FNU Spencer, Dr. T. Robertson, FNU Killingsworth and others
Plaintiff:
Myron McNeal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Parker et al
as 1:2019cv01080
Defendant:
Jennifer Williams, Arvil Chapman, Jane Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
