Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Perkins v. Hininger et al
as 1:2023cv01178
Plaintiff:
Milton Keith Perkins
Defendant:
Damon Hininger, Dr. f/n/u Hancock, John Doe, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pakala v. U.S. District Court Judge et al
as 2:2023cv02247
Plaintiff:
John Pakala
Defendant:
U.S. District Court Judge, Attorney of Record, U.S. Marshall Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Coffee
as 2:2022cv02613
Petitioner:
Terrance Williams
Respondent:
Judge Lee V. Coffee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goff v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv01190
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Goff
Defendant:
Judge Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Bradley Champine and Jeremy B. Epperson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Henderson County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ray
Defendant:
Henderson County, Tennessee, Judge Steve Beal, 26th District Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett et al v. Anderson
as 1:2022cv01042
Plaintiff:
Cedric Barnett and Tiffany Barnett
Defendant:
Judge J. Blake Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. Weirich et al
as 2:2021cv02675
Plaintiff:
Vernon Charles Patton
Defendant:
Amy Weirich, Judge Mitchell, W. Mark Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2021cv01143
Plaintiff:
Octaivian Demetrius Reeves
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Al Earls, Judge Roger Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Coffee
as 2:2021cv02121
Petitioner:
Adrian Dontrell Young
Respondent:
Judge Lee Coffee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cole v. Madison County District Attorney et al
as 1:2021cv01010
Plaintiff:
Darius Cole
Defendant:
Madison County District Attorney and Madison County Criminal Court Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
