Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Floyd v. Graham-Doaks et al
as 1:2014cv01312
Plaintiff:
Davey Terrell Floyd
Defendant:
Tasma Graham-Doaks, Tracey Howell, Michael Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ageless Men's Health, LLC v. Asbill et al
as 2:2014cv02364
Plaintiff:
Ageless Men's Health, LLC
Defendant:
Graham "Case" Asbill and PT Elite Men's Health, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henvey v. Doaks
as 1:2014cv01075
Plaintiff:
Anthony Henvey
Defendant:
Graham Doaks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atwood v. Graham Lumber Company, LLC
as 1:2014cv01032
Plaintiff:
Brian Atwood
Defendant:
Graham Lumber Company, LLC
Miscellaneou:
Peggy Smotherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gross v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2013cv01075
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Gross
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Graham-Doaks, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. El Bey et al
as 2:2012cv03049
Plaintiff:
C. Jones, Mullens, Bond and others
Defendant:
Noble Atum Re Hotep El Bey and Antron Sprowels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Graham v. Easterling et al
as 1:2012cv01176
Petitioner:
Charles Graham
Respondent:
Joe Easterling and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Graham et al v. AARTI, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01036
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Graham and Felicia D. Graham
Defendant:
AARTI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Whitlow et al v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2011cv03030
Plaintiff:
Tranice Whitlow and Raymond Whitlow
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Bill Oldham, Shelby County Sherrif's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
