Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Reames v. Casagrande et al
as 2:2011cv02949
Plaintiff:
Orlando Reames
Defendant:
Casagrande, Baldridge, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richmond v. Wright et al
as 2:2011cv02292
Plaintiff:
Linnell Richmond
Defendant:
Newton Wright, Jr., James Daneil, William C. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson-EL v. Moore et al
as 2:2011cv02291
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Thompson-EL
Defendant:
Robert Moore, Louis Montesi, Jr., Kevin P. Key and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2010cv02912
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Ingram
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Shelby County Criminal Justice Jail, M. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Forster v. Little et al
as 2:2010cv02204
Defendant:
George M. Little, Henry Steward, Tommy Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Forster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McAllister v. Little et al
as 2:2009cv02762
Plaintiff:
Rodney McAllister
Defendant:
George Little, Henry Stewart, Wayne Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2007cv02646
Petitioner:
Newton O. Bey
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2007cv02424
Plaintiff:
Newton Bey
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Bruce Pearson, Dion E. Franklund and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
