Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Howard v. Donahue et al
as 1:2014cv01076
Plaintiff:
Christopher Howard
Defendant:
Michael Donahue, Mitch Bradshaw, Tennessee Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Beatrice Velasco et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv02613
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Velasco , Georgia Lou Payne , Rodney Penland and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP , Astrazeneca PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Conner v. Shelby County, TN. et al
as 2:2012cv02199
Petitioner:
Cher Tretesse Conner
Respondent:
Shelby County, TN. and Desoto County, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conner v. Skinner
as 2:2011cv02622
Plaintiff:
Darryl Conner
Defendant:
Ben Skinner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Conner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2011cv01211
Plaintiff:
Casie Conner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Conner v. The United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2011cv02476
Plaintiff:
Harry Conner
Defendant:
The United States Postal Service and The United States Department of Labor's Office of Worker's Compensation Program
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Sharrieff v. Huntington Bank et al
as 2:2011cv02340
Defendant:
Huntington Bank, Christopher W. Conner and Donald A. Mausar
Plaintiff:
Othman Sharrieff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carroll v. Hardeman County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2010cv01185
Plaintiff:
Jerry Carroll
Defendant:
Hardeman County Correctional Facility, Corrections Corperation of America, Christian Chrismaru and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Easterling et al
as 1:2010cv01068
Plaintiff:
Kenny Ray Morris
Defendant:
Joe Easterling and Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
