Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Powell v. Clemons et al
as 1:2010cv01242
Plaintiff: Edward D. Haymon Powell
Defendant: Chris Clemons, Masson McDowell and Dyersburg City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DePriest v. Clemons et al
as 1:2010cv01240
Plaintiff: Patrick DePriest
Defendant: Chris Clemons and Masson McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. McDowell et al
as 1:2010cv01239
Plaintiff: Jonathan Jones
Defendant: Masson McDowell and Chris Clemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01237
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tate v. McDowell et al
as 1:2010cv01187
Plaintiff: Dontonio Tate
Defendant: Masson McDowell, Chris Clemons and State Gazzette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maze v. McDowell et al
as 1:2010cv01152
Plaintiff: Paul David Maze
Defendant: Masson McDowell and Chris Clemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maze v. McDowell et al
as 1:2010cv01121
Plaintiff: Paul Maze
Defendant: Masson McDowell and Chris Clemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02234
Plaintiff: Martha Ann Adams, Martha Ann Adams, Becky Allerheiligen and others
Defendant: Morgan Asset Management, Inc., Regions Financial Corporation, MK Holding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Watson v. Dyersburg City Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02718
Plaintiff: Timothy C. Watson
Defendant: Dyersburg City Police Department, Mason (Joe) McDowell, Christopher Clemmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDowell v. Piccadilly Restaurants, LLC
as 2:2007cv02829
Plaintiff: Odis McDowell
Defendant: Piccadilly Restaurants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?