Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv02968
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
King v. Mays et al
as 2:2010cv02424
Plaintiff: Hattie L. King
Defendant: Samuel H. Mays, Jr., Jon Phipps McCalla, Graham Askew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Hardin Co. Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2010cv01001
Plaintiff: Elijah W. Graham
Defendant: Hardin Co. Correctional Facility, Ned Oldaker and James Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallis et al v. City of Bethel Springs, Tennessee et al
as 1:2009cv01268
Plaintiff: Cassandra Wallis and Rodney Steen
Defendant: City of Bethel Springs, Tennessee, Bobby Gray, Vernon Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02744
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02622
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
E.R. v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2008cv02378
Plaintiff: E.R.
Defendant: City of Memphis, Shelby County, Shelby County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Graham v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 1:2008cv01135
Plaintiff: Joyce Graham
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Miscellaneou: Diane Barrier Polk
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Graham v. Arthur Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01099
Plaintiff: Robert Graham
Defendant: Arthur Enterprises, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dixon v. Barrow et al
as 2:2008cv02277
Petitioner: Watson Dixon, Jr.
Respondent: John Barrow, Max Burn, Adam Toledano and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?