Cases 21 - 30 of 1,255
Hester v. Chester County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
Michael Hester
Defendant:
Chester County, Tennessee, Blair Weaver, Mark Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Strata et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sanders
Defendant:
Frank Strata, Brandon Watwood and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Ballard v. Cajun Operating Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02076
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ballard
Defendant:
Cajun Operating Company, Inc., Cajun Global, LLC, Fris Chkn, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dalton v. Fisk et al
as 2:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Dalton
Defendant:
John Fisk and Centurion Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv02071
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2024cv02070
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv02069
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv02068
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
