Cases 21 - 30 of 35
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Howard et al
as 2:2013cv02650
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Jessica Howard, Mark Dodson, Sharika Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dayin Harper et al v. Highway 70 Car Care Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02196
Defendant:
Highway 70 Car Care Inc, Johnny Dennison and Joshua Dennison
Plaintiff:
Dayin Harper , Derrick Holmes , Marcus Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Montgomery v. Memphis Police Dept. et al
as 2:2012cv02976
Plaintiff:
Samuel Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
Memphis Police Dept., J. Clapp, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
H B vs. Harper, et al
as 1:2012cv01010
Plaintiff:
H B
Defendant:
Sandra Harper , Steve Nunley , Tim Haney and others
Miscellaneou:
Shonna Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. S.C.D.C. et al
as 2:2011cv03084
Plaintiff:
Dana Walker
Defendant:
S.C.D.C., James E. Coleman, Dennis Tillman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Memphis Mental Health Institute et al
as 2:2010cv02679
Plaintiff:
Carla Houston
Defendant:
Memphis Mental Health Institute, Family Counseling, CSA'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harper v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2010cv02664
Plaintiff:
George H. Harper, II
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Shelby County Correction Center
as 2:2009cv02838
Plaintiff:
Dantonio Sentell Harper
Defendant:
Shelby County Correction Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Harper v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2009cv02521
Plaintiff:
William Charles Harper
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, K. Williams, Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
