Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Law Office of J. Houston Gordon v. Bates et al
as 2:2016mc00034
Movant:
Law Office of J. Houston Gordon
Respondent:
Larry C. Bates, Charles Edward Bates, Robert Bates and others
Fowler et al v. Nelson et al
as 2:2016cv02698
Plaintiff:
Charles Wesley Fowler and The Fowler Law Firm, PLLC
Defendant:
Misty D Nelson , Jessie Nelson, Mark West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goree v. Sutter & Gillham, PLLC, et al.
as 2:2016cv02588
Plaintiff:
Mitch Goree
Defendant:
Sutter & Gillham, PLLC, Andrew C. Clarke and Law Office of Andrew C Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper v. Shelby County Government
as 2:2016cv02151
Plaintiff:
Rodney Harper
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Mark Luttrell, Jr., William Oldham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rowan v. Workers' Compensation/Rowan Law Firm et al
as 2:2015cv02206
Plaintiff:
Brent A. Rowan
Defendant:
Workers' Compensation/Rowan Law Firm, City of Memphis, U.S. Dept. of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. HSBC Mortgage Services Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01053
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Robinson
Defendant:
HSBC Mortgage Services Inc. , Shapiro and Incle, LLP and Marinosci Law Group, PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brown v. Burch, Porter & Johnson PLLC, et al.
as 2:2015cv02167
Plaintiff:
Kim Brown
Defendant:
Burch, Porter & Johnson PLLC Law Firm , Tannera George Gibson , Memphis City Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
