Cases 21 - 30 of 46
National Labor Relations Board v. Payne
as 2:2016mc00038
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Jamison Payne
Wallace v. Holloway et al
as 2:2016cv02390
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wallace
Defendant:
James M. Holloway, Fitts, Thomas Shells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King et al v. Commissioner Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2015cv01303
Plaintiff:
Sharmaine King and Chastity Parham
Defendant:
Commissioner Department of Human Services, State of Tennessee Governor, Deborah Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archer v. City of Memphis, et al.
as 2:2015cv02676
Plaintiff:
John W. Archer
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Joseph Payne and Larry Weston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hackworth et al v. Elder Care Social Services, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02659
Plaintiff:
Sharon Hackworth and Felicia Payne
Defendant:
Elder Care Social Services, LLC, Priority One Transportation, LLC, Johnny Lee Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Payne v. Brix Management, LLC
as 2:2015cv02625
Plaintiff:
Purvis Payne
Defendant:
Brix Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Durrett v. GMF-Serenity Towers, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02732
Plaintiff:
Eunice Payne Durrett
Defendant:
GMF-Serenity Towers, LLC, Sheilah Hooks and Memphis Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. West Tennessee State Pent.
as 2:2014cv02066
Petitioner:
Larry Payne
Respondent:
West Tennessee State Pent.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Beatrice Velasco et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv02613
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Velasco , Georgia Lou Payne , Rodney Penland and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP , Astrazeneca PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
