Cases 61 - 70 of 144
Wingo v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv01259
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wingo
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Tony Parker, Jeff Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cargill, Inc. v. James Mill Farms, LLC
as 2:2010cv02584
Petitioner:
Cargill, Inc.
Respondent:
James Mill Farms, LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Mills v. Hardeman County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2010cv01190
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline M. Mills
Defendant:
Hardeman County, Tennessee, Hardeman County Sheriff's Department, Delphus Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Tenn. Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv01111
Plaintiff:
James W. Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Tenn. Dept of Corrections, Gayle Ray, Ruben Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forster v. Little et al
as 2:2010cv02204
Defendant:
George M. Little, Henry Steward, Tommy Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Forster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gwin v. Mills
as 2:2010cv02081
Petitioner:
Jermaine Gwin
Respondent:
David Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bond v. ADM Milling Co.
as 1:2010cv01019
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Bond
Defendant:
ADM Milling Co.
Miscellaneou:
Judy Barnhill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Moses v. Mills
as 2:2009cv02830
Plaintiff:
Donna Moses
Defendant:
Raymond Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2009cv02811
Plaintiff:
Jacob Randall Miller
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Tommy Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saldana v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv02786
Petitioner:
Mario Juarez Saldana and Mario Juarez Saldana
Respondent:
United States of America and Marcel Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
