Cases 71 - 80 of 126
Murley v. Hammond et al
as 1:2011cv01274
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Murley
Defendant:
Bettie Hammond and Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rose v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2011cv01054
Plaintiff:
Darrell Rose
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, David Burkeen, Gene Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. NWCX et al
as 1:2011cv01031
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale
Defendant:
NWCX, Tony Parker, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finley v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2011cv01008
Plaintiff:
Tracy T. Finley
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Tony Parker, Ruth Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Murff v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv02930
Plaintiff:
Anthony Murff
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Private Corporation, Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2010cv01313
Plaintiff:
Darrell Rose
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Spectrum Health Services, Inc., Steven Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingo v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv01259
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wingo
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Tony Parker, Jeff Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holley v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
as 1:2010cv01257
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Holley
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
