Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Cases 81 - 89 of 89
Scarbrough v. Tennessee, State Of et al
as 2:2008cv02392
Plaintiff: Earl Scarbrough
Defendant: Tennessee, State Of, Tony Parker, Henry Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bohannon v. Baptist Memorial Hospital - Tipton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02220
Plaintiff: Willard Earl Bohannon and Willard Earl Bohannon
Defendant: Baptist Memorial Hospital - Tipton and Baptist Memorial Health Care Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
McDaniel v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2007cv02718
Petitioner: Vivian Earl McDaniel
Respondent: State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright-Hines v. Kroger, et al
as 2:2007cv02655
Plaintiff: Angela Earl Wright-Hines
Defendant: Kroger, Kroger Management and Kroger's affiliated security's company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright-Hines v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv02422
Appellant: Angela Earl Wright-Hines
Appellee: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Trotter v. Dotson
as 1:2007cv01080
Petitioner: Earl Trotter
Respondent: Stephen Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Younger et al v. Cannon et al
as 2:2007cv02139
Plaintiff: Michael L. Younger and Joe Henry Moore
Defendant: Cannon, Robbie Jowers, James Boyette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooden v. Evans et al
as 2:2007cv02017
Plaintiff: James Earl Wooden
Defendant: Paul Evans, Gary Bates, Memphis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waters v. Hesson
as 2:1999cv03003
Petitioner: Timothy Earl Waters
Respondent: Alton Hesson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?